Skip to main content

Should Euthanasia Be Legal? | Essay, Sample

essay Should Euthanasia Be Legal?

 Should Euthanasia Be Legal? 

 Euthanasia refers to assisting patients that suffer from a painful disease, an incurable illness or those that are in an irreversible coma to die. Due to the legal, moral and ethical implications of euthanasia, it has attracted a lot of controversy and debate within the contemporary globalized society (Purdy and Flora 35). Euthanasia can be passive in the form of withdrawing medication, surgery or life support from a patient. It can also be voluntary, such as when requested by the terminally ill, or can take the form of a physician aiding a patient to die through the administration of specific medication (Lesser 332). Regardless of its form, it is argued that euthanasia should not be legal. 

Activists who support euthanasia argue that people have an intrinsic human right to choose whether they want to die or live. However, this argument is against the moral and ethical principles on the sanctity of life (Chaloner and Karen 43). It is therefore argued that assisting a person to die is synonymous with deciding that some lives worth less than others. In this sense, legal frameworks should protect the sanctity of life by maintaining that euthanasia is illegal. In addition, those who support euthanasia argue that it does no harm to patients because they are already in a state of suffering. However, scientific arguments, such as the implementation of palliative care reveal why euthanasia is unnecessary and should not be legalized (Purdy and Flora 36).

 Proponents of euthanasia argue that if it is legalized, assisted death could be controlled in a more effective manner. Nonetheless, there is no guarantee that if euthanasia is legalized, there would be no ethical malpractice, such as assisting patients to die when it is not necessary or in cases when it does not serve the values and interests of family members (Lesser 331). Due to the fact that most legal frameworks are drawn from ethical and moral principles of the global society, legalizing euthanasia is tantamount to giving human beings the power to take life. It is therefore argued that legal frameworks should support religious values that state that life and death are decisions that can only be made by God. Societal attitudes and values towards life and death can only remain conservative and pro-life if euthanasia remains illegal (Chaloner and Karen 45). 

The scarcity of medical resources and aid should not be used to justify the legalization of euthanasia. This is because people have equal rights and privileges of utilizing resources such as health services, regardless of their conditions (Purdy and Flora 34). Legalizing euthanasia will limit the implementation of the principles of equity in health care. This will result in a decline in medical and nursing care quality especially for terminally ill patients and the elderly (Lesser 334). It is only through the law that the standards of health care should be promoted. Therefore, legalizing euthanasia should also be opposed because it is likely to result in the commercialization of healthcare services, such as focusing health care resources towards patients who have more chances of recovery (Purdy and Flora 35). Euthanasia should remain illegal to prevent disparities in health care quality among terminal conditions and other diseases.  

Works Cited 

Chaloner, Chris and Karen, Sanders. "Euthanasia: The Legal Issues (Cover Story)." Nursing Standard 21.36 (2007): 42-46. 
  • Lesser, Harry. "Should It Be Legal To Assist Suicide?" Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 16.2 (2010): 330-334 
  • Purdy, Debbie, and Flora, Finlay. "Should Assisted Suicide Be Legalized?" New Internationalist 450 (2012): 34-36.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

How to Write a Character Analysis | Essay Writing Tips

How to Write a Character Analysis First, you need to choose, which character you're going to analyze. I suggest you choose a character, who changes. If you have to write about Finding Nemo, (The Walt Disney story), then you might be tempted to choose Nemo, because, after all, the title has his name in it- he must be the main character. But, really, the character, who changes the most and who really goes on a journey, is the Father- Marlin, so he's the character best suited for a character analysis.  So, number one- choose a character, who changes! All right, now you've chosen which character to analyze, you're going to have to think of inferences. Let me give you an example of what I mean by that. Here's some…here's an inference down here, but let me start with this-“FACT: Marlin hovers”. We know (if you've watched this film) that Marlin is the dad and he hovers over his son and doesn't want to let him be independent and try new things or t

CyberCrime | Essay, Sample

  Cybercrime  Cybercrime involves the use of computers and networks to commit crimes. With the advancement in technology, computers can be used to commit crimes or to target victims. Criminals commit these offenses against groups or individuals with the motive of harming the victims' reputation intentionally, cause mental or physical harm either directly or indirectly. These criminal activities are aided by the use of modern telecommunication technology such as mobile phones and the internet. This type of crime can adversely affect the financial security of both the government and the private sector. Organizations, government and the citizens should enact appropriate security measures to mitigate the possibilities of becoming victims of cybercrime.  Cybercriminals have advanced their illegal activities, making it possible for them to be involved in various criminal activities such as hacking, child pornography, and copyright infringement. These illegal activities have n

Ethical Aspects of Cloning | Essay, Sample

  ETHICAL ASPECTS OF CLONING  Cloning refers to the somatic cell nuclear transfer that creates biological material that is genetically identical to the parent (Reeve, 2013). For instance, an organism or organ can be used to create genetically identical replicas. As such, the process of cloning creates a genetic duplicate. The discussion over whether there is any ethical justification for cloning is very polarizing. This is because many arguments have been advanced to support and reject cloning, particularly concerning the potential medical benefits and fate of the rejected clones. In this respect, the ethical debate is centered on what is to be done with excess clones and how they are disposed off (Morrison, 2013). Therefore, the subject of cloning generates a lot of ethical debates since it presents potential benefits as well as harm.  As earlier indicated, cloning involves the creation of replicas that are genetically identical to the parent. In this case, there are tw